Connect your business systems without adding operational drag.

I help teams whose tools do not talk to each other connect them reliably, so data moves between systems and failures become visible before they cost a deal.

Where the problem shows up

Most teams do not buy bad software. They buy capable tools that were never designed around the exact way their business operates, so CRM data sits in one place, invoices in another and support activity somewhere else. The usual remedy is a person: someone exports, copies and reconciles, and reporting arrives after three spreadsheets have been merged.

That hidden manual work becomes expensive. Deals wait for updates, finance does not trust operational numbers, and customer handoffs depend on memory. The person who connects the systems becomes the integration layer of the business. What happens when that person is away, or when a field is renamed in one tool and nobody notices? And how many decisions rest on data that was correct when it was exported?

The better principle is to give each system a defined role, a clear data contract and a monitored path for information to move. That is the work I do.

What I have changed for others

60+ websites: one schema so results can be compared

Performance data from more than 60 websites was stored differently on each. I designed a shared analytics schema and centralised the data in BigQuery. Teams can now compare any property with any other. Read the case study.

Client reporting: five data sources in one funnel

Google Ads, call tracking, Google Business Profile, analytics and the CRM were each reported on separately. I built a Looker Studio system that connects them, so acquisition metrics sit beside lead stages and conversion outcomes in one dashboard per client. Read the case study.

26 ledgers: one intercompany procedure

Intercompany balances across 26 ledgers could not be explained consistently. I designed standardised categorisation rules and a formal intercompany procedure, so balances between entities can be compared on the same terms. Read the case study.

What changes for your business

Data arrives in the right system in the right format, with enough observability to trust it. Each important record has one authoritative source, and a failed transfer raises an alert and has a recovery path. The work can include mapping systems and ownership, data contracts, workflow integrations, monitoring and documentation.

Where this leads next

Integration is the mechanism behind data liquidity and the base for automation without fragile copy-and-paste steps. The detail of common integration paths and the implementation approach is below.